Employment law- gross misconduct
What is gross misconduct?
Gross misconduct is behaviour by an employee, which is so serious that it goes to the root of the contract and destroys the relationship between an employer and employee. The conduct must be deliberate or amount to gross negligence, which then entitles the employer to dismiss an employee with immediate effect, and without any notice.
The following are the most common examples of gross misconduct:-
- malicious damage;
- breach of confidentiality;
- internet or email abuse;
- fighting or assault on another person;
- breach of an alcohol or drugs policy;
- actions which endanger other employees’ safety;
- gross negligence;
- a serious act of insubordination.
Many employers will set out in their contract of employment or company handbook what they consider to be an act of gross misconduct, and this can vary depending on the nature of your role. Employers will be in a stronger position to defend any claim if they clearly identify in advance what constitutes gross misconduct – and that this has been brought to your prior attention. In many scenarios (such as dishonesty or theft), the position will be obvious-regardless of what the company policy or contract states.
The fact that an employer’s policy lists an act as gross misconduct (which you may be guilty of) does not mean that a tribunal will automatically make a finding on this basis. See below for how a tribunal will determine the matter.
What process does your employer need to follow?
The ACAS code of practice applies to dismissals for misconduct. In summary, the ACAS code provides that before dismissing someone for misconduct, an employer should:
- investigate the issues;
- inform you of the issues in writing;
- give you an opportunity to respond;
- conduct a disciplinary hearing or meeting with you (and provide you with sufficient notice);
- inform you of the decision in writing;
- provide you with the right to appeal.
If you are facing an allegation of gross misconduct, you may well face a suspension on full pay, pending an investigation. If this does happen, the suspension should only be for as long as necessary for the investigation to be completed. in addition, your employer should only follow this course of action where there is prima facie evidence of the alleged misconduct, with perceived risks to the business. If the suspension is unreasonably too long, it may affect your credibility in going back to work- whatever the outcome of the investigation. Such a breach of trust and confidence on your employer’s part could give rise to the possibility of you making a claim for constructive dismissal.
If your employer does not follow a correct process and you lose your job, this could in itself amount to unfair dismissal.
How will an employment tribunal decide if gross misconduct was a fair reason for your dismissal?
A tribunal will consider a number of factors when considering if the dismissal was fair, including;
- Whether your employer had a genuine belief in your guilt?
- Was this belief reasonable?
- Was the matter properly investigated?
- Was a disciplinary meeting held where the you could state your case?
- Were you given sufficient notice of the meeting?
- Were you given notice of your right to be accompanied by a work colleague or trade union official?
- Were you provided with supporting documents and/or witness statement in advance of the meeting?
- Did you have an adequate opportunity to state your case?
- Was the disciplinary meeting chaired by an impartial person?
- Were you given the right to appeal the decision?
- Did your employer follow its own policy (if there was one)?
- Has consistency been applied by your employer for similar previous offences with other staff?
It is important to note that when determining fairness, an employment tribunal will not consider whether you were actually guilty or innocent of the misconduct- but whether your employer believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, that you were guilty of the misconduct at the time. This is an important distinction. To have reasonable grounds for the belief, your employer must have conducted an appropriate level of investigation and have sufficient material upon which to form that belief.
The tribunal will then consider whether your employer acted within the “range of reasonable responses” in treating misconduct as a sufficient reason to dismiss you. This means the tribunal will not be substituting its own view, or whether it might have reached a different decision- but whether your employer objectively acted reasonably in both the decision to dismiss and the investigation.
In determining what is reasonable, it may be, for example, that demotion or a final warning is a more appropriate and proportionate sanction.
If your employer cannot satisfy the above, you may have a claim for unfair dismissal.
What does and doesn’t amount to “reasonable” is going to vary on the individual facts of each case. It is wise to obtain early professional advice.
Does your employer have to dismiss all employees who have committed the same misconduct?
Not necessarily. It depends on whether there are any differences in the circumstances of the various employees to justify the disparity of treatment. If there are no differences, the question a tribunal will then need to consider is whether or not it was reasonable for the employer to dismiss one employee and not the other. It will not always be easy for an employer to show why they were not consistent in their approach.
In one recent case,however, a tribunal determined that if it was reasonable for an employee to dismiss one employee “the mere fact that the employer was unduly lenient to another employee was neither here nor there“.
Should you resign if you are facing an allegation of gross misconduct?
When you first face an allegation of gross misconduct, it is natural to want to either defend the allegations vigorously, go through the process to apologise and hope it goes away, or resign before you are dismissed (thereby keeping your reputation intact).
Whether or not you agree with the disciplinary action against you, a dismissal for gross misconduct may cost you dearly in terms of your future career. This is especially if any job reference gives reasons for the dismissal, which can make it very difficult to secure new employment. If there is overwhelming supportive evidence against you and your employer has instigated disciplinary proceedings, the reality is you are likely to be dismissed. In fact even without such evidence, the mere fact that your employer is proceeding down a gross misconduct route (rather than a less draconian route) all points to a likely dismissal.
The question of whether or not you should resign before the gross misconduct hearing is one we are often asked. At first glance, this may seem like a good idea- to leave before you are pushed. Indeed in some cases, this is an appropriate course of action. However, there are other considerations to think about. If you simply resign when facing gross misconduct allegations, how does this look to your employer? It could be construed as a clear sign of guilt, even though you may be maintaining your innocence and that your employer has put you in an impossible position.
You would also be giving up the opportunity to put your case, or appeal any dismissal. This could adversely affect any subsequent employment tribunal claim you may want to make. At the same time, you are putting at risk a future job reference if it is disclosed to your new employers that you resigned after facing allegations of gross misconduct. You may also be “jumping the gun” in that it’s possible a lesser sanction would have been imposed had you taken the opportunity to defend your position.
You should also bear in mind that even if you do resign with the intention of working your notice, your employer can still decide to hold the gross misconduct hearing during the notice period- and then dismiss you with immediate effect. If this happens, you won’t receive the balance of your notice payments.
Where a resignation may be tactically better is where your employer has either raised a trumped up and unsubstantiated allegation against you and/or not followed a fair disciplinary process. Your argument here would be that this has put you in an impossible situation and destroyed the trust and confidence between the parties. This would effectively be a constructive dismissal claim.
A negotiated exit
Where you believe that dismissal is on the cards in any event, and that any future relationship with your employer is untenable, it is often much more beneficial for a negotiated exit to be considered. This is a highly tactical situation.
Essentially, if it can be shown that there is a legal basis to defend the allegations (either because they are unreasonable or because of a failure of process), your employer may have an incentive to agree settlement terms. This is especially where there remains some goodwill towards you on a personal level, and/or where your employer feels there is some risk to a claim.
A typical exit package is a lump sum payment together with a job reference in return for which you would warrant not to bring any tribunal claim against your employer. If terms can be agreed, you are likely too be asked to sign a settlement agreement which makes the deal binding and upon which you must take independent legal advice.
In looking at a negotiated exit, and employer is usually only going to be persuaded to enter into settlement discussions if they are at risk on the legal side. It is for this reason that it is usually better to have a professional to deal with the negotiations with your employer, who can put your position as it should be put and employ the necessary strategy to achieve a favourable result. Most HR personnel are very familiar in dealing with employment lawyers.
We have advised thousands of employees and senior executives facing gross misconduct proceedings. Usually, urgent advice is needed, together with appropriate solutions.
We have a very high success rate in negotiating favourable settlements, and will consider a no win- no fee funding arrangement.
What if you don’t have 2 years qualifying service? Are there any claims you can still make if you have been dismissed for gross misconduct?
You need to be employed for a minimum of 23 months and 3 weeks (and not having already been given notice) before you can make a claim for unfair dismissal. If you are therefore dismissed for gross misconduct prior to this period without any notice, then your options are limited.
You may, however, have grounds to bring a wrongful dismissal claim on the basis that your employer has breached your contract in failing to pay your notice because of a misconceived gross misconduct allegation. To justify summary dismissal, the misconduct must equate to a fundamental breach of the contract of employment. The main claim you could therefore make is a potential one for unpaid notice. However, you may also have a claim for lost salary. This additional claim would be made if your employer has not followed a contractual process in dismissing you, and would reflect the loss of salary for the time that any contractual procedure would have taken had it been followed.
You can bring a claim in the civil courts or at employment tribunal for wrongful dismissal/ breach of contract. However, civil court claims are usually expensive and the losing party will pay the costs of the winning party, increasing the risks, which doesn’t usually happen in the tribunal.